[Zlib-devel] zlib-1.2.5 DLL build

Gilles Vollant info at winimage.com
Sat Jul 17 17:51:52 EDT 2010


the "686" optimisation is still useful for modern processor, but it can be
useful do measurement

this is also true for x64 optimization

-----Message d'origine-----
De : zlib-devel-bounces at madler.net [mailto:zlib-devel-bounces at madler.net] De
la part de Cosmin Truta
Envoyé : samedi 17 juillet 2010 23:22
À : zlib-devel at madler.net
Objet : Re: [Zlib-devel] zlib-1.2.5 DLL build


> Speaking of speed: I didn't follow the ASM-related discussions lately.
> Is contrib/inflate86 up to date? Is contrib/asm686 just for 686, or is
> it good for generic x86? Do they provide any sizable increase in
> execution speed?
> Should I build a DLL that uses them?

I am still curious about the state of the gcc-asm modules. By
following this list I could tell that the VC-asm modules are
well-tested, and they seem to offer a small speed improvement, but how
about gcc-asm? Did anybody run any tests? (I'd like to do that myself,
but the time I can spend on Windows is minimal these days.)

Best regards,
Cosmin







More information about the Zlib-devel mailing list